Wednesday, September 6, 2017

Bank on it

Greedy banks exposed
Big banks are pushing Congress to roll back post-2008 regulations, claiming the new rules hamper their ability to lend. But closer investigation reveals greed is the true culprit, giving Americans yet another reason to be wary of banks and seek alternative stores of wealth.
Here’s what you need to know…

Mega-Banks Crying Wolf

The regulations that big banks are griping about relate to reserve requirements, i.e. how much capital banks are required to keep on-hand in relation to the money they lend out. Essentially, the regulations are intended to keep banks from going underwater in the event of a major crisis, where a large number of their loans go bad.
These reserve requirements are a hallmark component of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street reforms that came in the wake of our last major crisis, and abolishing them would arguably give back the same rope banks used to hang themselves (and the rest of us) 10 years ago.
Banks claim that’s far from the case, and that their intentions are pure. But as FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig reveals, these regulations have little to do with banks’ ability to lend.

The Real Reason Banks Aren’t Lending More

Hoenig is no stranger to the regulatory landscape. He served as a high-ranking Fed official from 1991 through 2011, during the height of our last major crisis. He knows the mechanisms behind these regulations well, and he isn’t about to let big banks twist the truth.
So when Hoenig testified before Congress in August, he pointed out the real reason why big banks are paring down their lending: The top 10 U.S. banks are blowing over 100% of their earnings on share buybacks and dividends.
See, for years after our last crisis, banks were prohibited from this kind of activity. But now, they can legally do any of these three things with their earnings:
  1. Distribute them to shareholders as dividends.
  2. Use them to buy back their own stock.
  3. Retain them as operating capital.
As you can probably guess, the first two options are far more profitable for banks than the third. Therein lies the real motivation for banks to hound Congress for deregulation. According to Reuters:
Big banks say tight U.S. financial regulation forces them to sit on capital and not put money to work by making loans, but in truth they choose to distribute all of their earnings to investors instead of lending them, a long-time regulator said in a letter to two powerful senators released on Wednesday.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig, frequently a Wall Street gadfly, has long said the biggest banks should be required to set aside more capital so they can weather a crisis without devastating the financial system.
It’s not that these regulations keep banks from lending. Rather, they keep banks from frivolously spending their earnings to prop up stock prices while continuing to lend at the same time. Given the choice of one or the other, big banks choose to prop up stock prices rather than build up capital reserves for a rainy day.
In the first quarter of 2017 alone, if banks would have retained their earnings instead of dumping them into dividends and buybacks, they could have increased lending by $1 trillion. Banks chose NOT to retain those earnings, therefore they didn’t lend as much as they could have.
As we learned back in 2008, mega-bank greed isn’t a victimless offense…

Who Bank Greed Hurts the Most (And What to Do About It)

Average savers are the ones who get the short end of the stick here. And the reasons why are simple…
First and foremost, banks are taking consumers’ money, paying next to nothing back in interest, and then leveraging that capital to turn a shady profit. That by itself gives savers a good reason to start storing their wealth elsewhere.
On top of that, banks will eventually be unable to keep propping up their stock prices. The number of shares they can buy back with earnings is limited. That means they could be setting themselves up for a big fall in the long run… a fall that could shake the entire system. And while big bankers have little to worry about themselves, it could put savers at serious risk.
But there is something savers can do to circumvent the crooked activities, and accompanying risks, in the banking industry today: they can invest in physical precious metals.
Physical precious metals offer a vehicle for storing wealth that cannot be manipulated by banks (or anyone else for that matter). Metals can never be artificially propped up or debased, and their value can never be put in jeopardy by greed or incompetence. Most importantly, nobody but you controls how your wealth is used or handled when it’s stored in precious metals.
Big bankers want to use your money to line their pockets, while you shoulder all the risk. For anyone who wants to opt out of their plan, securing a stake in physical precious metals would be a prudent move.

Saturday, July 8, 2017

Cancellation of Debt (COD) Income

Cancellation of Debt (COD) Income

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Taxpayers in the United States may have tax consequences when debt is cancelled. This is commonly known as COD (Cancellation of Debt) Income. According to the Internal Revenue Code, the discharge of indebtedness must be included in a taxpayer's gross income.[1] There are exceptions to this rule, however, so a careful examination of one's COD income is important to determine any potential tax consequences.
Billions of dollars of cancelled debts will generate many unexpected tax bills, due to debt cancellations that financial institutions have started accelerating in 2012. [2]


Policy reasons behind COD income[edit]

Accession to wealth[edit]

The standard definition of income is found in a United States Supreme Court case entitled Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.[3] The Court defined income as 1) accession to wealth; 2) that is clearly realized; and 3) over which the taxpayer has complete dominion.[4]
Prior to this decision, the Court had already determined that the cancellation of debt was "a freeing of assets."[5] Essentially, when debt is cancelled, money that would have been used to pay that debt is now free to be used on anything else the taxpayer wants. This is also known as "accession to wealth." Therefore, under Glenshaw Glass, it seems only natural to include COD income in gross income.

Symmetry[edit]

A loan by itself is neither gross income to the borrower, nor a tax deduction to the lender. This is because there is "symmetry" of assets and liabilities on both side: the borrower's increased wealth when the loan is taken out is offset by an obligation to repay that same amount. Likewise, the lender's loss of wealth by lending out that money is offset by the borrower's promise to pay back the entire amount.[6] Ignoring interest, both sides will be in exactly the same position when the loan is repaid as they were in before the loan was even made.
When debt is cancelled, then that symmetry is destroyed. The borrower is now in a better position than if the loan was fully repaid. The taxpayer now has a greater ability to pay taxes and this is shown by including the amount of canceled debt in gross income.

IRS Form 1099-C and reporting requirements[edit]

Who must file IRS Form 1099-C[edit]

Generally, any creditor canceling debt of $600.00 or more is required to file Form 1099-C by January 31 of the next year following the date when the debt was canceled.[7]
The creditor may be a lending institution, the subsequent holder of a note, a trustee for multiple owners of a single note or a governmental unit, but also includes individuals and business organizations of all kinds.
Failure to file Form 1099-C may subject the taxpayer to civil penalties, but such penalties are relatively minor,[8] and rarely exceed $150.00 per form. There is no exemption from the filing requirement if canceled debt in excess of $600.00 is recognized.

When one must file IRS Form 1099-C[edit]

Generally, IRS Form 1099-C is to be filed along with reporting Form 1096 by the end of January of the year following the date when the debt was canceled.[9] However, if that date falls on a weekend, the filing date is postponed to the next business day.

Special Circumstances[edit]

Rail Joint doctrine[edit]

Whether or not there is cancellation of indebtedness income can sometimes be ambiguous and controversial. In Commissioner v. Rail Joint Co.,[10] a corporation issued its own bonds as a dividend to its shareholders. When the bonds declined in value, Rail Joint repurchased them for less than their face amount. Ordinarily, retiring bonds for less than the issue price would result in taxable canceled debt. However, in holding that there was no COD for Rail Joint, the court noted that, unlike in a normal issuance of corporate debt for cash consideration, the original issuance of these bonds as dividends did not increase the capital of the corporation and did not create burdened assets to be later freed by the cancellation.
The IRS has formally non-acquiesced to the Rail Joint doctrine, arguing that what really happens in these situations is a constructive dividend and purchase: The corporation constructively issues a cash dividend to shareholders, who then contribute that cash back to the corporation in exchange for the bonds; the burdened asset is thus the constructively re-contributed cash. Rail Joint is nonetheless good law, and has been expanded to encompass other situations where the taxpayer received nothing of value in exchange for the debt, such as when a guarantor of a loan who did not enjoy the benefit of the loan settles it for less than the face amount.

Nonrecourse debt[edit]

Whether secured debt is recourse or nonrecourse can have significant consequences if the debt is settled in foreclosure of the secured property.[11] Generally, while the net gain or loss is the same regardless of the classification of the debt (it will always be the difference between the basis of the burdened property and the amount of the debt), there are potentially huge tax differences.
When property burdened by nonrecourse debt is foreclosed upon, there is no cancellation of indebtedness even if the amount of the loan exceeds the fair market value of the property. The case of Commissioner v. Tufts holds that in such a situation, the amount realized is the amount of the debt, and the fair market value of the property is irrelevant. That this difference between the adjusted basis of the property and the amount of the debt is simple gain rather than COD has potential upsides and downsides. On the one hand, the gain would be capital gain assuming the property foreclosed upon were a capital asset, unlike COD which is ordinary. On the other hand, COD is potentially excludable, as by insolvency (see below).
If the same property had been burdened by recourse debt, and, as above, that property were foreclosed upon in full satisfaction of the debt, you would get a different result. The gain or loss would be determined with reference to the fair market value of the property, and the difference between the fair market value and the debt would be COD. (This intuitively makes sense because with recourse debt, any cancellation of the outstanding balance of the debt, after it has been satisfied to the extent of the FMV of the property given up, really is a termination of personal liability to pay that amount, unlike in a situation where the debt is nonrecourse). If the property has a value lower than its basis, then in the case of recourse debt you could get a capital loss and COD ordinary income on the same transaction, netting to the same dollar figure as with nonrecourse debt but potentially much worse for the taxpayer: The taxpayer would not only be burdened with ordinary rather than potentially capital gains, but may have more total income to report, offset only by a capital loss that would be unusable (except to a nominal extent in the case of individuals) if the taxpayer had no other capital transactions for the year. Only in the case of a taxpayer able to utilize one of the COD exclusions, such as insolvency, could this result be better.

Disputed Debt Doctrine[edit]

The Disputed Debt Doctrine (also known as the Contested Liability Doctrine), is yet another exception to including COD income in gross income.[12] This doctrine can be found in a Third Circuit Court of Appeals case, Zarin v. Commissioner.[13] In order for this exception to apply, the amount of debt must actually be disputed. This can happen if the two parties actually have a good faith dispute over the amount owed. A written instrument containing the amount of debt will probably not satisfy this requirement. However, as the court decided in Zarin, the Disputed Debt Doctrine can also apply if the debt is not legally enforceable.[14]

Exclusions[edit]

Not all COD income must be included in gross income. There are several exceptions:[15]
  • If the discharge of indebtedness occurs in a title 11 case
  • If the discharge of indebtedness occurs when the taxpayer is insolvent
  • If the indebtedness discharged is qualified farm indebtedness
  • If the indebtedness discharged is qualified real property business indebtedness
In addition, the Code recognizes a Purchase Price Adjustment exception.[16]
  • Student loans forgiven for working for certain classes of employers are also excluded[17]

Requirements[edit]

In order to qualify under these exclusions, the taxpayer's indebtedness must result from either
  • indebtedness for which the taxpayer is liable; or
  • indebtedness subject to which the taxpayer holds property[18]
For example, if the lender cannot legally enforce the debt, then the taxpayer is not liable for that debt and will therefore not have tax consequences.[19]
If one of the two requirements are met, then the taxpayer must show that they fall under one of the four exclusions in order to avoid tax consequences on the COD Income.

Policy Reasons Behind COD Income Exclusions[edit]

The exclusions under Section 108 are justified under various rationales. First, it is difficult to collect tax from insolvent taxpayers. The bankruptcy and the insolvency provisions defer the tax to a time when taxpayer is able to pay. The farm indebtedness provision, on the other hand, represents a political decision to subsidize farmers by offering a tax benefit. The student loan exclusion for those who do certain types of work is designed to maximize that benefit. There have been lobbying efforts[20] to amend 108(f)(1) for those who get total and permanent disability discharges, since under Department of Education rules, such borrowers are subject to a three-year post-discharge review period during which their incomes from employment cannot exceed the poverty line.[21]

Title 11 Case[edit]

A Title 11 case is one that falls under Title 11 of the United States Code (relating to bankruptcy).[22]

Insolvency[edit]

A taxpayer is insolvent when their total liabilities exceed the fair market value of assets.[23] For example, if a taxpayer has $100,000 in liabilities, but only $50,000 in assets, they are considered insolvent under the Internal Revenue Code. Therefore, a cancellation of a $20,000 debt will not need to be reported as gross income. However, if a debt of $60,000 was cancelled, the taxpayer will have $10,000 in gross income because their total liabilities no longer exceed their total assets (cancelling $60,000 in debt means the taxpayer now has only $40,000 in liabilities).
The criteria for the insolvency exclusion are considerably more strict than those used under bankruptcy law. The asset base for the insolvency exemption includes tax-advantaged retirement accounts, almost all types of which are excluded by law from the asset base in bankruptcy.[24] The asset base for the insolvency exclusion also includes assets that serve as collateral for any debt carried by the taxpayer.[24]

Qualified farm indebtedness[edit]

A taxpayer has qualified farm indebtedness if
  • such indebtedness was incurred directly in connection with the taxpayer's trade or business in farming; and
  • 50% or more of the aggregate gross receipts of the taxpayer for the three taxable years preceding the discharge is attributable to the trade or business of farming[25]
However, such a taxpayer must be a "qualified person" as defined in 26 U.S.C. § 49(a)(1)(D)(iv)[26]
There are additional rules as well regarding the total amount excludable, which cannot exceed the sum of tax attributes and business and investment assets.[27]

Qualified real business property indebtedness[edit]

A qualified real property business indebtedness is indebtedness which
  • was incurred or assumed by the taxpayer in connection with real property used in a trade or business and is secured by such real property;
  • was either 1) incurred or assumed prior to January 1, 1993, or 2) incurred or assumed to acquire, construct, reconstruct, or substantially improve the real property; and
  • the taxpayer elects to apply this exception[28]
However, this exclusion will only reduce the basis of the depreciable real property of the taxpayer.[29]

Purchase price adjustment[edit]

Sometimes a price agreement will be reached between buyer and seller, but for some reason both agree to reduce that price at a later date. A strict reading of the Internal Revenue Code says that the amount reduced is COD income, it does not fall under one of the four exclusions, and is thus gross income. To remedy this situation, Congress passed 26 U.S.C. § 108(e)(5), also known as the purchase price adjustment. If a reduction in price occurs after the parties have already reached an agreement, the Code treats the new agreed-upon price as if it were the original price, which means there will not be COD income to the buyer.[16]

Reduction in Tax Attributes[edit]

General[edit]

If COD income is excluded from gross income, the taxpayer's tax attributes must be reduced,[30] which is done through IRS Form 982 (Reduction of Tax Attributes Due to Discharge of Indebtedness). A taxpayer's tax attributes are, and must be reduced in the following order:[31]
  • Net operating loss (NOL) - Any NOL of the taxable year of the discharge
  • NOL carryover - Any NOL carryover to the taxable year of the discharge
  • General business credit - Any carryover to or from the taxable year of a discharge of an amount for purposes for determining the amount allowable as a credit under 26 U.S.C. §38 (relating to general business credit)
  • Minimum tax credit - The amount of the minimum tax credit available under 26 U.S.C. §53(b) as of the beginning of the tax year immediately following the taxable year of the discharge
  • Net capital loss - Any net capital loss of the taxable year of the discharge
  • Capital loss carryover - Any capital loss carryover to the taxable year of the discharge
  • Basis reduction - The basis of the property of the taxpayer
  • Passive activity loss and credit carryovers - Any passive activity loss or credit carryover under 26 U.S.C. §469(b) from the taxable year of the discharge
  • Foreign tax credit carryovers - Any carryover to or from the taxable year of the discharge for purposes of determining the amount of the credit allowable under 26 U.S.C. §27
The reduction in tax attributes is made after the determination of the tax imposed for the taxable year of the discharge.[32]
When reducing NOL or capital loss carryovers, the reduction in tax attributes must be in the order of the taxable years that each carryover was created in.[33]
When reducing general business credit or foreign tax credit carryovers, the reduction in tax attributes must be made in order that the carryovers are taken into account.[34]

Policy Reasons Behind Reducing Tax Attributes[edit]

In the case of excluding COD income from gross income, that policy prevents creating a new tax burden on insolvent and bankrupt taxpayers, who are likely in a situation where they financially need that benefit, and who would likely be difficult or impossible to collect from.
However, in the case of reducing the taxpayer's tax attributes, this policy does not create a new tax burden on the taxpayer. It instead reduces tax credits and carryforwards that would be used to offset future earned income.
If a taxpayer's tax attributes were not reduced, taxpayers could intentionally create large tax attributes by creating debt, cancelling the debt, and unjustly reducing their future taxes without paying on the debt. For example, a taxpayer could intentionally run up large amounts of business debt and losses, creating a large NOL. Then, after filing a bankruptcy to wipe out the debt, they could use the NOL carryforward for up to twenty years or until it was exhausted.

Amount of Reduction of Tax Attributes[edit]

The reductions in tax attributes are dollar-for-dollar to the amount of excluded COD income for the: NOL, capital loss carryover, and basis reduction.[35] The reductions in tax attributes are 3313 cents-for-dollar of amount of excluded COD income for the: general business credit, maximum tax credit, passive activity loss and credit carryovers, and foreign tax credit carryovers.[36]

NOL Special Treatment for S Corporation[edit]

S Corporations do not have net operating losses (NOL). Instead, the concept of NOL is handled at the shareholder level. Each shareholder must treat any loss or deduction that exceeds their stock and debt basis as a suspended (disallowed) loss, which carries forward indefinitely until applied toward future earned income pass through by the S Corporation.[37]
So that the shareholders of an S Corporation do not receive a tax benefit when individuals or other forms of business would not, when reducing tax attributes current year NOL is substituted by the shareholders' current year disallowed loss, and the NOL carryovers are substituted by the shareholders' disallowed loss carryovers.[38] The tests for exclusion of cancellation of debt income still happen at the S Corporation level.[39]
Furthermore, on March 9, 2002, President Bush signed the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002. This act prohibited shareholders from increasing basis for their portions of the S Corporation's excluded cancellation of debt income, for discharges of indebtedness after October 11, 2001. This effectively overturned the January 9, 2001, U.S. Supreme Court decision to allow such increases in basis in Gilitz v. Commissioner, 531 U.S. 206 (2001).

Election to Reduce Basis First[edit]

A taxpayer may elect to apply the tax attribute reduction first against the basis of depreciable property of the taxpayer, not to exceed the aggregate adjusted bases of the depreciable property held by the taxpayer as of the beginning of the taxable year following the taxable year of the discharge.[40]

In Case of Separate Bankruptcy Estate[edit]

If a separate bankruptcy estate was created, the trustee must reduce the bankruptcy estate's tax attributes by the cancelled debt.[41] The taxpayer then "inherits" the ending tax attributes of the bankruptcy estate.

Notes[edit]

  1. Jump up ^ 26 U.S.C. § 61(a)(12)
  2. Jump up ^ USA Today page A1 published March 5, 2012 "Old debt could lead to tax bills"
  3. Jump up ^ 348 U.S. 426 (1955)
  4. Jump up ^ Id.
  5. Jump up ^ U.S. v. Kirby Lumber Co., 284 U.S. 1 (1931)
  6. Jump up ^ Samuel A. Donaldson, Federal Income Taxation of Individuals: Cases, Problems and Materials, 2nd Edition (St. Paul: Thomson/West, 2007), 113.
  7. Jump up ^ "Form 1099-C, Cancellation of Debt". Irs.gov. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  8. Jump up ^ "Bank Cannot Issue 1099-C And Subsequently Try To Collect". Forbes.com. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  9. Jump up ^ IRS tax forms
  10. Jump up ^ 61 F.2d 751 (2nd Cir. 1932)
  11. Jump up ^ "What's the Difference Between a Recourse and Nonrecourse Loan?". Nolo.com. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  12. Jump up ^ "Taxation of Cancellation of Debt Income". schuhgoldberglaw.com. Retrieved 14 December 2013. 
  13. Jump up ^ 916 F.2d 110 (3rd Cir. 1990)
  14. Jump up ^ Id.
  15. Jump up ^ 26 U.S.C. § 108(a)(1)
  16. ^ Jump up to: a b Id. § 108(e)(5)
  17. Jump up ^ 26 U.S.C. § 108(f)(1)
  18. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(d)(1)
  19. Jump up ^ See Zarin v. Commissioner, 916 F.2d 100 (3rd Cir. 1990)
  20. Jump up ^ http://www.pebforum.com/transition-issues/12662-student-loan-repayment-program-issues.html
  21. Jump up ^ "Total and Permanent Disability Discharge: Post-Discharge Monitoring Period". Texas Guaranteed Student Loan Corporation. Retrieved May 5, 2013. 
  22. Jump up ^ 26 U.S.C. § 108(d)(2)
  23. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(d)(3)
  24. ^ Jump up to: a b "Insolvency" (PDF). Publication 4681: Canceled Debts, Foreclosures, Repossessions, and Abandonments (for Individuals) – For Use in Preparing 2012 Returns. Internal Revenue Service. January 15, 2013. p. 5. Retrieved May 15, 2013. 
  25. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(g)(2)
  26. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(g)(1)
  27. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(g)(3)
  28. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(c)(3)-(4)
  29. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(c)(1)
  30. Jump up ^ 26 U.S.C. § 108(b)(1)
  31. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(b)(2)
  32. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(b)(4)(A)
  33. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(b)(4)(B)
  34. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(b)(4)(C)
  35. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(b)(3)
  36. Jump up ^ Id.
  37. Jump up ^ Id. § 1366(d)
  38. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(d)(7)(B)
  39. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(d)(7)(A)
  40. Jump up ^ Id. § 108(b)(5)
  41. Jump up ^ IRS Publication 908 (Bankruptcy Tax Guide)

Friday, June 2, 2017

Government Assistance To Help With Utility Expense

Government Assistance To Help With Utility Expense


  December 08, 2016       typesofaid.com Staff
Over three decades ago, Congress voted to establish a new program called Low-Income Home Energy Assistance. The U.S. government funds it with grants. When it was created, the Federal Social Service oversaw LIHEAP. Officials eventually transferred control to the Department of Health and Human Services. State governments also play a role in operating this assistance program.

Although LIHEAP originally only provided help with existing fuel or electricity bills, it has expanded to supply several related services. All of the program's features are designed to help low-income Americans maintain safe indoor conditions throughout the year.

How Does LIHEAP Work?

People with rather low levels of income can qualify for assistance. The government pays a portion of their cooling and/or heating bills. Americans may receive extra help in energy emergencies. This assistance makes it easier for people to afford other essentials, such as food, water, health care and clothing. The program also funds residential weatherization projects that reduce utility costs. It engages in energy-related education efforts. Government agencies use LIHEAP money to improve heating and cooling safety as well. They strive to prevent medical problems related to unsuitable indoor temperatures.

Who Qualifies For LIHEAP?

This program benefits a wide range of low-income families and individuals. People who rent their homes can qualify, even if they reside in public or subsidized apartments. A renter may be reimbursed for energy bills by the government. On the other hand, a landlord might receive the money and charge tenants less rent. Most states allow people to use LIHEAP while receiving benefits from other agencies. It doesn't disqualify citizens from using the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or Temporary Assistance for Needy Families. The same goes for Veterans Affairs and Social Security benefits. Nonetheless, it's important to check the rules for a specific state.

How Much Does It Pay?

Assistance amounts vary considerably depending on the situation. This program will pay different sums based on an applicant's income, state and number of family members. If someone lives in a house and uses it as his or her primary residence, the person will probably be counted as a family member. The payment also varies based on how much a household pays for heating and/or cooling. Citizens can qualify for LIHEAP regardless of their employment status. However, employed individuals must earn less than the income limit to receive benefits. Every state maintains a different limit.

Weatherization Services

This program devotes a portion of its funds to home repairs and enhancements. Such projects must improve a house in ways that reduce utility bills in the future. Some people use the money to buy insulation and repair drafty windows or doors. Any effort to seal outer walls and entrances will cut energy bills. It makes sense for LIHEAP to pay for weatherization projects because this reduces the public's need for fuel and electricity assistance. Most of this funding goes to homeowners. Rented dwellings also qualify for weatherization assistance, but the government requires landlords to contribute a significant amount of money.

Additional LIHEAP Services

This program offers different services depending on a person's location. State government offices can provide people with more information about the options that are available to them. In addition to paying upcoming utility bills, LIHEAP may assist citizens with overdue bills. It can provide funding for the replacement of air conditioning or heating equipment that doesn't work efficiently. The new units must be more efficient and capable of substantially reducing energy bills. This program may also work to prevent utility-related damage and injuries during emergencies. For example, it can help people shut off utilities in a flood or hurricane.

Tuesday, May 30, 2017

4 Creative Ways to Pay Off Your Mortgage Faster

4 Creative Ways to Pay Off Your Mortgage Faster


       typesofaid.com Staff
You want to pay your mortgage off as quickly as possible, but this can be quite a challenge. People often get into a habit of making the same mortgage payment each month and never considering that they have options that could shorten the process. There are, however, some creative and often overlooked ways to pay off your mortgage more quickly. Let’s look at some of the possibilities you might not have considered.

1. Make a Small Increase in Your Monthly Payments

Paying even a little more each month will shorten the length of your mortgage loan. You may have to adjust your budget here and there to find the extra money. Most people, if they look at how much they spend on frills such as fast food, coffee and impulsive purchases, can find ways to make a larger mortgage payment each month.

2. Make Biweekly Rather Than Monthly Payments

This is a trick that allows you to make the equivalent of one extra monthly payment per year. The reason for this is that when you make biweekly payments, you will be making a total of 26 payments in a year. This is the same as making 13 monthly payments rather than 12.

3. Use Tax Refunds, Work Bonuses and Unexpected Dividends Towards Your Mortgage

People often like to use tax refunds as a way to make fun purchases or perhaps take a vacation. While this can be nice, it will be better for your financial health to think of your tax refunds as a way to make some extra mortgage payments. Bonuses are another instance where you might have to exercise some self-discipline. It can be tempting to use your bonus to help pay for holiday gifts. If you’re serious about paying your mortgage off promptly, however, it would be wiser to use your bonus to make a dent in what you owe. The same principle applies to any type of unexpected dividends, such as inheritances, gambling winnings or a raise or promotion at work.

4. Refinance to a Shorter Term Mortgage

Refinancing to a shorter term mortgage will allow you to pay it off faster. This will entail higher payments, but it can be worth it in the long run as the day of your final payment is moved forward. The most common way to do this is to switch from a 20 year to a 15 year mortgage. If you can handle it, you might even consider a 10 year plan.

Monday, May 29, 2017

Unclaimed and Undelivered Tax Refunds

Unclaimed and Undelivered Tax Refunds


Did you not get a tax refund this year? Did you not send in a tax return because you think that your income is too low? If the answer to either one of those questions is yes, then you may be entitled to some money. Every year, millions of tax refunds are unclaimed and undelivered. In 2011, the IRS had $153 million in refunds that were waiting to be issued. There are a number of reasons that people do not receive their tax refunds.

Undelivered tax Refunds

Every year, the IRS sends out refund checks to about 30 million people. Some of these tax refunds are sent to the wrong address, so they are returned to the sender. Others are never cashed because they are lost in the mail. If you manually filed your taxes and have not received a refund, then you want to make sure that the IRS has your correct address.

Unclaimed tax Refunds

If your income was too low to file taxes, then you may still be able to get a refund. This is because you may be able to get an Earned Income Tax Credit, which is given to low-income earners. You can get this credit regardless of whether taxes were taken out of your earnings. There are income limits that apply. The maximum income is contingent upon your household size and whether you file jointly.

If you have an unclaimed tax refund, then it is important to contact the IRS as soon as possible. You will not be able to get a refund if you do not file taxes within three years. For example, if you have an unclaimed tax refund from 2015, then you will have until 2018 to claim it. The money will become the property of the U.S. Treasury if you do not claim it within three years. Keep in mind that you will not be charged a penalty for filing your tax return late if you are owed a refund.

What to do if you have an Unclaimed tax Refund

If you did not get your tax refund because the IRS does not have the correct address, then you can update your address using the "Where's my Refund?" feature. You will be prompted to give a new address if the IRS was not able to contact you within the past 12 months.

You can also update your address using Form 8862. This is a Change of Address Form, which can be found on the IRS website. You can also call the IRS directly and request a form.

You can also consult with your tax preparer if you have an unissued refund. Your refund may be delayed because the information on your tax refund was not correct. You can update this information by calling the IRS directly.

You can find the forms you need to file your tax returns on the IRS website. You can also get these funds by calling the IRS. Everyone could use an extra $3,116. This is the average unclaimed tax refund amount.

How to Prevent This From Happening in the Future

The main reason that refunds are not delivered is because the IRS does not have people's correct address. That is why it is important to make sure that the IRS has your current address. If you choose to get your refund delivered via direct deposit, then you will need to make sure that the banking information is correct.

Make sure that you keep track of the status of your refund using the "Where's my Refund?" feature. There are three options. Your return is processing, refund has been approved, or it has already been sent. If all of the information is accurate, then you should get your refund within three weeks. However, there are several things that can cause a delay in your refund.

Keep in mind that if your refund is rejected, then you can correct the errors and submit your tax return again. There is no charge for submitting an amended tax return.

Furthermore, you may want to consider e-filing your taxes and signing up for direct deposit. This will not only ensure that your taxes are done correctly, but you will also be able to get your refund much faster.